Terror, Youth, Muslim 

The chronological regularity of actual and attempted attacks committed by a tiny number of young,
British-born or British-based Muslims, including shoe bomber Richard Reid in 2001, the two Tel
Aviv ‘Mike’s Place’ bombers in 2003, the four 7/7 London bombers in 2005 and the Christmas Day
bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmuttallab in 2009, has seen the wholesale stigmatisation of young
Muslims in Britain. Specifically, young Muslims have become a focal point in the War on Terror,
identified both by state security and by terrorist recruiters as vulnerable to violent radicalisation.
Despite, or perhaps because of, the lack of consensus in defining and explaining this process of
radicalisation, certain factors have been identified as key in increasing or curtailing this
vulnerability. One such factor is identity, and this article explores the way in which, at the level
of discourse, each ‘side’ in the War on Terror competes for control over the social, political and
religious positionality of young Muslims. Identity thus becomes a symbolic battleground coopted
through three recurring narratives: belonging, loyalty and duty. For young people, the impact of
these dominant and regulatory discourses in pathologising their identities, especially in the sensitive
social context of post-7/7 Britain, can be devastating, creating further insecurity and alienation.
This article identifies the role of specialist Muslim youth workers who provide a coherent,
grassroots-orientated challenge to these narratives, and who, at considerable personal and
professional risk, work with the most vulnerable young people to create alternative articulations of
identity. I suggest that Muslim youth work not only encourages more positive ways for young
Muslim people to engage with and experience the world, but also, in resisting the binaries created
within the War on Terror, contributes to a more holistic, human-focused approach to security. 

14 p.; 27 cm